Home Topics Learn Prayer Site Map Top 10

6.         Promise and threat:

         We hold that Allah is true to His promise and threat.

         We hold belief in eternal existence o the people of Paradise in paradise, and in eternal existence of the people of Hell in Hell.

         We hold that both Paradise and Hell are everlasting and will never pass away.

         We hold that God's reward to His friends in the World to come, and His punishment for His enemies in the World to Come do not resemble His reward and punishment in this World.

7.         The intermediate position:

         We hold that the state of hypocrisy is the intermediate position between faith and polytheism.

         We hold that Hypocrites are neither Believers nor Polytheists.

         We hold that Polytheists are neither believers nor Hypocrites.

         We believe that the believers are neither Hypocrites nor Polytheists; and whosoever calls any one of these by the name of another is an 'infidel-ingrate.'160

8.         No intermediate position:

         We hold that there is no intermediate position between faith and disbelief.

         We hold that he is an 'Infidel-ingrate' him who maintains that the whole of faith is monotheism, and all disbelief is polytheism.

         We hold that Allah forgives the minor sins of those who avoid major sins, but He does not forgive major sins except through repentance.

         We hold belief in designating as 'infidel-ingrate' the profligate woman who has sexual intercourse not per vulvam.

         We hold belief in designating as 'infidels-ingrate' those who practice interpretation erring in their interpretation.

9.         The names and statutes:

         We hold that the names are subject to the statutes, and we hold that the statutes affecting Monotheists are not like the statutes affecting Polytheists, and that the statutes affecting Polytheists are not like those affecting Monotheists.

         We hold that the statutes affecting the Monotheists in their relation with each other are one and the same, except for (walayah) and designation as Believers, for only Muslims who fully discharge their religious obligations are entitled to these.

         We hold that the People of the Book; the Jews, the Christians and the Sabaeans are not hypocrites, but they are Polytheists.

         We hold that he who alters the statutes of Allah or His Apostle is a Polytheist.

         We hold that he who denies "individual reasoning' ra'y and the Sunnah is an 'infidel-ingrate.'

         We hold that Allah's proof to His servants is the Books and Apostles.

         We hold that there is no hijrah after the opening up (fat`h) of Mecca.

         We hold that gnosis of God cannot be attained through reflecting or compulsion, and that it can only properly be arrived at through an instructor and admonisher.

11.       al Nukkar:

         During the time of Abu Ubaidah Muslim b. Abi Karimah the seeds of the splinter Nukkar group were planted.  A number of his intellectual students possessed and developed certain views on theological and juridical problems.  They were Abdullah b. Abd al-Aziz, Abu al-Ma’ruf Shua’ib, Abu al-Mu’arrij  Amr b. Muhammad, Hatim b. Mansur, and Abdullah b. Yazid al-Fazari.  They expressed some of their views during the life of Abu Ubaidah, but he refuted them and expelled them from the majalis.161  It is reported that they recanted and repented, and were allowed to rejoin the meetings of the Ibadhis and participate in the activities of the Ibadhi community in Basrah.162  After the death of Abu Ubaidah, they again asserted their views left to the successor of Abu Ubaidah, al-Rabi b. Habib to refute their views and denounce them.163

         It was these same men who founded the most important Ibadhi group beside the original and the mainstream of the Ibadhi school, al-Wahbiyah. The foundation of their movement as a political opposition to the Wahbiyah began in North Africa, but the intellectual side of the movement was started and developed by those scholars in Basrah.

         This splinter group was know as al-Nukkar (deniers), for their denial of the Imamate of Abd al-Wahhab b. Abd al-Rahman b. Rustam.164  They were also known by other names:  Nakithah, Nakkathah, Nukkath for the word (    ), to violate, because they violated the oath they made to Abd al-Wahhab;165 al-Najwiyyah, from the word al-Najwa, secret intrigue, which was known of them when discussing the question of the Imamate after the death of the first Rustamid Imam and the election of his son Abd al-Wahhab.166  They were also called Mulhidah, blasphemers, because they blasphemed regarding the names of Go;167  Yazidiyah, after their theologian Abdullah b Yazid al-Fazari, or perhaps after their political leader in Tahert, Yazid b. Fandin;168  Shaghabiyah for the disturbance (shaghab) which they brought about;169 and by Maslawah, the name of one of the main Berber tribes of their adherents.170

         The Nukkar branch of the Ibadhi school was, in fact, an integrated movement which tried to be independent of the mother Ibadhi movement.  They developed their own views on theology and followed the opinion of heir own authorities in jurisprudence. According to Ibadhi historians, Nukkar followed Abdullah b Abd al-Aziz, Abu al-Mu'arrij, and Hatim b. Mansur in jurisprudence, and Abdullah b. Yazid al-Fazari in theology.171

<Previous | Table of Contents | Next>

Copyright for all only provided that the contents of this site are not changed www.islamfact.com